How should students revise? A brief guide
One of the biggest lessons from research is that many students don’t really know how to study. Various studies have shown that students rate re-reading and highlighting as the most effective ways of revising when in reality they are often a waste of time giving an illusion of competence in the short term at the expense of long term gains.
Students may spend large amounts of additional time studying despite no gain in later memory for the items, a phenomenon called ‘‘labour-in-vain’’ during learning (Nelson & Leonesio,1988). Recent research with educationally relevant materials has shown that repeatedly reading prose passages produces limited benefits beyond a single reading. (Karpicke, Roediger, Butler, 2009)
In contrast, retrieval practice, spacing and interleaving are some of the most productive ways of revising material but how many students are familiar with this? I think there is often a tendency to focus too much on what teachers are doing and less on what students are doing.
Recently I got the chance to talk to some year 10 students from across our partnership of schools about study skills and I put together a brief guide to help them. The idea was to introduce them to five powerful approaches to studying in a language they can understand with the opportunity to apply them to a period of revision designed by them. All materials are below.
Thanks to the brilliant Olivier Cavigioli for the illustrations and design.





Once you talk students through these key principles, you can get them to plan their revision using a revision planner like this depending on how much time they have left:
Further reading:
Koriat, Bjork ‘Illusions of Competence in Monitoring One’s Knowledge During Study’ 2005
The Dunlosky link doesn’t seem to be working any more? Otherwise – great stuff!
LikeLike
Reblogged this on .
LikeLike
Reblogged this on The Echo Chamber.
LikeLike
We would love to adapt the Wellington Study Guide for use this within our own organisation.
Are you happy for it to be used as is? Or can we credit you somehow?
LikeLike
I could have sworn there was an A4 version of this that folded into a booklet…
LikeLike