Five Things I Wish I Knew When I Started Teaching
1. Motivation doesn’t always lead to achievement, but achievement often leads to motivation.
While there is a strong correlation between self perception and achievement and we tend to think of it in that order, the actual effect of achievement on self perception is stronger than the other way round (Guay, Marsh and Boivin, 2003.) It may well be the case that using time and resources to improve student academic achievement directly may well be a better agent of psychological change than psychological interventions themselves. Daniel Muijs and David Reynolds (2011) note that:
At the end of the day, the research reviewed shows that the effect of achievement on self-concept is stronger that the effect of self-concept on achievement.
Despite this, a lot of interventions in education seem to have the causal arrow pointed the wrong way round. Motivational posters and talks are often a waste of time and may well give students a deluded notion of what success actually means. In my experience, teaching students how to write an effective introduction to an essay through close instruction, careful scaffolding and then praising their effort in getting there is a far more effective way of improving confidence than showing them a TED talk about how unique they are.
2. Just because they’re engaged doesn’t mean they’re learning anything.
One of the slides from a talk that has stuck with me the most in recent years was this one from Professor Rob Coe which in which he criticised graded lesson observations and highlighted several performance indicators for learning which are actually very misleading:
This again is quite a counterintuitive claim. Why is engagement is such a poor proxy indicator – surely the busier they are, the more they are learning? This paradox is explored by Graham Nuthall in his book ‘The Hidden Lives of Learners,’ (2007) in which he writes:
“Our research shows that students can be busiest and most involved with material they already know. In most of the classrooms we have studied, each student already knows about 40-50% of what the teacher is teaching.” p.24
Nuthall’s work shows that students are far more likely to get stuck into tasks they’re comfortable with and already know how to do as opposed to the more uncomfortable enterprise of grappling with uncertainty and indeterminate tasks.
3. Marking and feedback are not the same thing.
This subtle difference may seem semantic but there is an important distinction to be made. The value in marking a piece of work may counterintuitively be of more benefit to the teacher than the student as David Didau explains:
While there’s no doubt that marking and feedback are connected, they are not the same. In some parts of the world – Japan for instance – teachers do very little marking but that’s not to say students are not getting feedback. From my own experience, I’m pretty sure it’s possible to make marks in students’ books without providing anything in the way of useful feedback and of course lots of thinking (some of it disastrous) has been done to try to prevent this from happening. Ask any group of teachers if their marking load has increased dramatically in past five years and they’ll fall over themselves to let you know just how much impact marking has on their lives, but what impact does it have on students’ outcomes? The answer is, we just don’t know.
4. Feedback should be more work for the recipient than the donor.
Possibly the most damaging misappropriation of research in my career has been the mangling of Assessment For Learning – a quagmire from which we are now only beginning to emerge. Not long after Dylan Wiliam’s seminal 1998 ‘Inside the Black Box’ became adopted at a national level, school leaders and policy makers managed to twist it into a pale imitation of its original form as AFL became about students memorising what level they were working at and teachers marking books at a level that defied sense in order to show ‘evidence’ of learning. But for feedback to be truly meaningful to students, they need to take ownership of it which may well mean not giving levels to a piece of work at all and instead just leaving comments for the student to reflect and act upon. As Dylan Wiliam writes:
Robyn Renee Jackson suggests that one of the most important principles for teachers is “Never work harder than your students” (Jackson, 2009). I regularly ask teachers whether they believe their students spend as long processing feedback as it takes for the teacher to provide it. Few teachers say yes. We spend far too much time giving feedback that’s either completely ignored or given scant attention.
5. (a) The steps needed to achieve a skill may look very different to the final skill itself.
If you want to get good at a certain skill then surely the best way to get good at it is to practice that particular skill right? Well not according to the tenets of deliberate practice which asserts a more indirect approach that breaks a global skill down into its constituent local parts and focuses on specific feedback and incremental improvement rather than a set of assessment criteria/performance descriptors that are “aimed at some vague overall improvement.” (Ericsson) In her book ‘Making Good Progress’, Daisy Christodoulou writes:
Whilst skills such as literacy, numeracy, problem solving and critical thinking are still the end point of education, this does not mean that pupils always need to be practising such skills in their final format. Instead, the role of the teacher and indeed, the various parts of the education system, should be to break down such skills into their component parts, and to teach those instead. This means that lessons may look very different from the final skill they are hoping to instil. For example, a lesson which aims to teach pupils reading may involve pupils learning letter-sound correspondences. A lesson with the ultimate aim of teaching pupils to solve maths problems may involve them memorising their times tables. The idea here is that the best way to develop skills does not always look like the skill itself.
5. (b). There is no such thing as developing a ‘general’ skill.
Of course, critical thinking is an essential part of any student’s mental equipment. However, it cannot be detached from context. Teaching students generic ‘thinking skills’ separate from the rest of the curriculum is often meaningless and ineffective. As Daniel Willingham puts it:
[I]f you remind a student to ‘look at an issue from multiple perspectives’ often enough, he will learn that he ought to do so, but if he doesn’t know much about an issue, he can’t think about it from multiple perspectives … critical thinking (as well as scientific thinking and other domain-based thinking) is not a skill. There is not a set of critical thinking skills that can be acquired and deployed regardless of context.
This detachment of cognitive ideals from contextual knowledge is not confined to the learning of critical thinking. Some schools laud themselves for placing ‘21st-century learning skills’ at the heart of their mission but without anchoring them in domain specific contexts, they are often a waste of time. Anders Ericsson develops this point:
This explains a crucial fact about expert performance in general: there is no such thing as developing a general skill. You don’t train your memory; you train your memory for strings of digits or for collections of words or people’s faces. You don’t train to become an athlete; you train to become a gymnast or sprinter or a marathoner or a swimmer or a basketball player. You don’t train to become a doctor; you train to become a diagnostician or a pathologist or a neurosurgeon.
I’ve written more about this here and this by Dan Willingham is probably the definitive piece on critical thinking.
These are spot on and so frustrating to read, because, yes! Still!
Number 4 struck me in my first year of teaching: we were working on teaching year 8s the skills needed for year 12 exams. So I started working on how to construct sentences and different types of sentences (summary sentences, sentences that explain, sentences that describe) everyone else was working on how to write an essay and to nominalise. When marks were not improving, we then told to started teaching ‘analytical paragraphs’ in year 7. Everyone was so sure that this would solve the problem of year 12 not being able to write well… When I suggested we work on different writing skills, including (gasp) creative writing, this was deemed less important than ‘knowing’ how to write an essay
LikeLiked by 1 person
So, 5(a) really struck me…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on The Echo Chamber.
This is a really useful summary of the best in recent educational thinking, thank you. You know you have two paragraphs both labelled number 4?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Worth remembering these work both ways too? So motivation can be improved by BOTH success and intervention and therefore it can lead to improved performance and vice versa. Poor proxies for learning list of assumptions, if switched to the opposite slant? If children are not engaged; not interested; not working hard; not motivated (by delivery?); not attentive; or if the environment is not calm, ordered and managed effectively. Didau and Williams contributions offer great insight and are always worthy of consideration but the final points again work both ways. Therefore, for some children, breaking the skill down vis-a-vis Christodoulou will work and, for others, whole skill practice opportunities will benefit.
All in all, it’s complex and there are no easy solutions but getting to know every child deeply offers the most appropriate strategies. Relationships are the key.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on From experience to meaning… and commented:
Again a great post by Carl!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on kadir kozan.
Great post. Number 2 is the one that jolted me. The title shouldn’t be ‘Five Things I Wish I knew When I started Teaching’ but ‘Five Things I Wish SLTs Knew’.
Great stuff, Carl. Am working with HMCTT trainees again this summer/autumn and would love to use this with cohort 1 when we meet at the end of their second year, properly credited, of course. OK?
(And just watch practice/practise – first line of 5 (a). English teacher. Can’t help myself….
Hope to see you at EdFest!
excellent points altogether, you just won a emblem new reader.
What might you recommend about your post that you simply made a few days ago?
The conclusions you draw from achievement related motivation was absolutely spot on!! 👌 if your interested about tuition fee and whether we can afford them if appreciate some constructive feedback on my article https://theeducatedpolitician.wordpress.com/
“Our research shows that students can be busiest and most involved with material they already know.” Of course they are, so are all of you. None of you are critically asking whether the students in front of you have the physiological cognitive skills to process the contents of your lesson – you have assumed that and gone straight into sentence structures or whatever you feel comfortable with. You do not know how to assess how many of the students in front of you (a) actually know where the left and right sides of their body are i.e. have they achieved bi-lateral integration (b) whether they can process your speech or their classmates speech in a classroom environment (c) whether they can use two eyes together effectively to send messages from eye to brain or are they getting by on monocular vision….. all of those factors fundamentally affect learning, if you do not know the state of your students physiology you do not know how effective your teaching is or any of your teaching theories – you cannot possibly know.
I go on posting on this area because I know how alien it is to the English education system and that until you know 90% about it you will not engage with it, so drip by drip I try to engage you.
I enjoyed a number of insights in this article, especially #2. It gave me pause since I have written three English second language textbooks with “Actively Engaged” in the their titles. LOL!
You may think, “Oh, no, one of those,” for saying this, but I”ll risk it anyway. We say, “I wish I knew the answer,” when we wish about the present. We say, “I wish I had known,” when we wish about the past. You are wishing about the past. Your title…um…needs…um…a little something.
Motivation – depends what kind of motivation – extrinsic or intrinsic = which according to Self Determination theory depends on the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness being met. So you are right about competence leading to motivation. But it is not so simple. it depends on goals – whether the goals of kids are performance competence goals or intrinsic mastery goals. The former in the long term leads to avoidance and doing tasks with little risk and easy to score well.Most schools focus on cold cognition , how to improve test scores in the factory settings.
Engagement – The problem in schools is the lack of engagement, interest , learning with purpose , making meaning. We know the high achievers learn because they see grades as the vehicle to get into a good university and earn good money , not because there is any intrinsic value or enjoment in what is being studied.And this effects negatively on deeper learning and intrinsic mastery goals. Better to talk about the importance of engagement in real learning.
Feedback – reminds me of the question – we give grades and comments – what do kids check first ? grades – and second – the grades of their friends Difficult to make feedback contribute to learning when the focus is on testing , grades, and an obsession with assessment and data . Also we can give feedback while kids are learning , observing them and listening to them. Deborah Meier says – that teaching is essentially listening and learning is essentially telling and speaking. So in most classrooms the teacher is the only one learning .
Skills – agreed that to get better at a skill , why may need to work on certain aspects , but learning a skills is different – how did you learn to drive a car or learn musical notes – looking at the big picture , singing a song or learning particular skills in isolation. The skill in isolation is impossibly hard, but the skill embedded in a meaningful context is remarkably easy: Just sing the first two notes of the song “Tonight” from West Side Story In academics, too, we learn most readily, most naturally, most effectively when we start with the big picture